Sebastian Decoud vs David Fleming Head to Head Stats

• Second Serve Performance: Both players, Sebastian Decoud and David Fleming, have won 0% of their second serve points in recent months. How can this impact match predictions? It suggests neither has an edge in second serve effectiveness.
• Return Game Stats: In form, both players achieve 0% success returning second and first serves. Does this indicate a weakness? Yes, as return effectiveness is crucial in gaining an advantage.
• Under Pressure: Decoud and Fleming each saved 0% of breakpoints recently, raising concerns about their performance under pressure.
• Match Performance: Over the past year, each player won 0% of their matches, highlighting struggles across the season.
• Surface Proficiency: Decoud excels on Hard courts with a career win rate of 59%, whereas Fleming performs best on Clay with the same 59% win rate. Could surface preference influence the outcome? Potentially, given Decoud's past win over Fleming on clay.
• Player Level: Neither has recorded wins on the unnamed surfaces they frequented recently, offering no current competitive advantage.
• Direct Head-to-Head: Decoud leads 1-0 against Fleming in past encounters, both in sets and matches, with a decisive win last time on clay.
• Match Duration: Previous match lengths are unusually undocumented, indicating potential data gaps.
• Opponent Quality: Both faced opponents averaging a rank of 0, suggesting matches against unranked or fellow novices.
• Deciding Set Performance: The inability for both to win any deciding sets recently indicates struggles in closing out tough matches.

Editorial Prediction (December 22, 2025, UTC):

Both Sebastian Decoud and David Fleming display notable weaknesses in second serve performance and breakpoint opportunities, with neither obtaining points in these critical areas in recent months.

Despite similarities, Decoud holds a slight historical advantage with previous head-to-head success, having defeated Fleming their only encounter on clay, where no player currently shines in form.

Surface familiarity might play a role, with Decoud usually excelling on Hard courts and Fleming on Clay. However, this match's unexplored surface might even the field.

Assessments suggest cautious predictions, yet Decoud's past victory provides a fractional edge. Thus, Sebastian Decoud is slightly more likely to triumph in this future contest, albeit in a tightly contested matchup.